|
Á¶¼±»ì
|
|
 |
gXcuCJvIYzxUP |
 |
398 |
|
 |
I'm not working at the moment http://xvedio.in.net/ xvedios The only answer to this scepticism is to have a robust judging process involving a panel of scientists who carry out through research into the work of candidates. Though there will always be disagreement, a prize will then gain credibility among the scientific community over time if it’s seen to weigh the claims of each nominee seriously by making its own enquiries. Scientists will treat a prize whose winners are chosen for PR-reasons with scepticism. But if a prize develops a track record of picking winners who go on to be widely celebrated, then it will be seen as performing a useful function. |
 |
 |
Shelton |
 |
2019-06-07 11:35:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|